One of the videos that came out of the 2012 Cabling Icon contest could be used as a training aid for newcomers to the cabling-installation trade, as well as a refresher for some experienced installers.
In one round of the elimination tournament, contestants had two minutes to demonstrate their ability to drop a cable down a wall. Eventual contest winner Dan Dosch scored points in the contest as well as with commenters with his display. In just a little more than two minutes, Dosch used a stud finder to pinpoint the correct location for a mounting plate, cut a hole in the drywall, installed the mounting plate, cut a hole in the wall's top cap, installed a grommet in the hole, then dropped a Cat 6 cable down the wall and through the mounting plate.
All Cabling Icon contestant videos were posted to YouTube. You can watch Dosch's video here:
If you opt to view the video on YouTube rather than in this player, you may notice that the comments laud Dosch's practices. Specifically, one commenter noted the activity is "fully OSHA compliant," citing the use of a hard hat, safety glasses, safety cone, and appropriate ladder type for the job environment.
As the winner of the Cabling Icon contest, Dosch competed in the BICSI Cabling Skills Challenge, which was held as part of BICSI's 2012 Winter Conference. Also for his Cabling Icon victory, Dosch received a cash prize of $6,000, the Golden Punchdown award, and a leather vest with the Cabling Icon logo embroidered on it.
You can visit the Cabling Icon website here. Or, visit the page with all three wall-drop videos here.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
What's wrong with LEED
You want to know what's wrong with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program put forth by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC)? I'll tell you exactly what's wrong with it. You - the professionals who design and implement the structured cabling and wireless systems that are the central nervous systems of the business that actually gets done within buildings - are not part of the consideration for LEED certification. That's wrong, and it's what is wrong with LEED.
Over the past few years we have reported about the possibility of structured cabling systems, and the broader technologies they support, getting some consideration in the LEED process. It is evident that the possibility will not become a reality. Despite ongoing dialogue between the USGBC and organizations such as BICSI and others over the course of years, USGBC has shown no signs of including technology networks or network infrastructure in its evaluation of buildings seeking LEED certification.
Many of you who are cabling- and network-design professionals undoubtedly have lived the frustration of being left out of the LEED conversation. Your architectural and engineering colleagues have made decisions about a building's heating and cooling systems, windows, concrete foundation, carpet - even bicycle racks - based in some part on the extent to which these choices would affect the quest for LEED certification. Meanwhile, your efforts to design the most-efficient technology infrastructure possible have been all fine and good. But they haven't contributed a single point toward LEED. I shudder to consider that this fact of life may be affecting the funding of technology systems in new-construction projects that are gung-ho about achieving LEED certification, and align their construction budgets accordingly.
Now that I've vented for a few paragraphs, this green conundrum appears to have a silver lining. Recently I had the opportunity to learn about the rationale behind the creation of the Sustainable Technology Environments Program (STEP). Spearheaded by InfoComm, STEP is also being supported by BICSI, the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA). We've told you briefly about BICSI's and TIA's roles within STEP, including representation on the organization's board.
The primary reason for STEP being organized was ... well ... what I complained about earlier. Without a voice in the "green building" construction process, technology-based professions like yours have gone unrecognized for the extent to which your expertise helps a building achieve a certain level of sustainability.
STEP has a website, www.thestepfoundation.org, that no doubt will be fleshed out as the program develops further. Already on the site is a preliminary rating system, which you can check out here.
With a group like BICSI involved, I expect we'll see a comprehensive course of study developed for professionals who will implement the program. And with TIA, InfoComm and CompTIA also in leadership roles, I have to believe a set of clearly defined specifications will be coming as well.
Why the USGBC has chosen not to involve technology systems in its LEED program, I cannot say. It strikes me, though, that the components and systems that LEED considers are pretty much static once they are installed. Technology systems, on the other hand, are living, breathing, evolving ecosystems. (What, you don't think a technology system breathes? Next time you're in a telecom room, step behind the racks to the area of network-equipment exhaust. You tell me that's not the endless panting of a live, tired and overworked beast of burden.) Perhaps that fact has had something to do with the USGBC's inaction.
So while STEP will not be part of the USGBC's LEED, it will be - in my opinion - a bona fide program that quantifies how "green" a building's technology systems are. And there is no better group to administer it than those who have put the program together.
Over the past few years we have reported about the possibility of structured cabling systems, and the broader technologies they support, getting some consideration in the LEED process. It is evident that the possibility will not become a reality. Despite ongoing dialogue between the USGBC and organizations such as BICSI and others over the course of years, USGBC has shown no signs of including technology networks or network infrastructure in its evaluation of buildings seeking LEED certification.
Many of you who are cabling- and network-design professionals undoubtedly have lived the frustration of being left out of the LEED conversation. Your architectural and engineering colleagues have made decisions about a building's heating and cooling systems, windows, concrete foundation, carpet - even bicycle racks - based in some part on the extent to which these choices would affect the quest for LEED certification. Meanwhile, your efforts to design the most-efficient technology infrastructure possible have been all fine and good. But they haven't contributed a single point toward LEED. I shudder to consider that this fact of life may be affecting the funding of technology systems in new-construction projects that are gung-ho about achieving LEED certification, and align their construction budgets accordingly.
Now that I've vented for a few paragraphs, this green conundrum appears to have a silver lining. Recently I had the opportunity to learn about the rationale behind the creation of the Sustainable Technology Environments Program (STEP). Spearheaded by InfoComm, STEP is also being supported by BICSI, the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA). We've told you briefly about BICSI's and TIA's roles within STEP, including representation on the organization's board.
The primary reason for STEP being organized was ... well ... what I complained about earlier. Without a voice in the "green building" construction process, technology-based professions like yours have gone unrecognized for the extent to which your expertise helps a building achieve a certain level of sustainability.
STEP has a website, www.thestepfoundation.org, that no doubt will be fleshed out as the program develops further. Already on the site is a preliminary rating system, which you can check out here.
With a group like BICSI involved, I expect we'll see a comprehensive course of study developed for professionals who will implement the program. And with TIA, InfoComm and CompTIA also in leadership roles, I have to believe a set of clearly defined specifications will be coming as well.
Why the USGBC has chosen not to involve technology systems in its LEED program, I cannot say. It strikes me, though, that the components and systems that LEED considers are pretty much static once they are installed. Technology systems, on the other hand, are living, breathing, evolving ecosystems. (What, you don't think a technology system breathes? Next time you're in a telecom room, step behind the racks to the area of network-equipment exhaust. You tell me that's not the endless panting of a live, tired and overworked beast of burden.) Perhaps that fact has had something to do with the USGBC's inaction.
So while STEP will not be part of the USGBC's LEED, it will be - in my opinion - a bona fide program that quantifies how "green" a building's technology systems are. And there is no better group to administer it than those who have put the program together.
Monday, February 20, 2012
BICSI honors members for industry service
At its annual awards ceremony held on Wednesday, February 15, BICSI honored a number of individuals who have contributed to the organization and to the industry as a whole.
Thomas "Lee" Renfroe, RCDD, ITS Technician, Certified Trainer was crowned BICSI Installer of the Year for finishing atop the 16 competitors in the 2012 BICSI Cabling Skills Challenge.
Additionally, BICSI awarded scholarships to two college/university students who are sons of BICSI members. Recipients of the Ray Gendron/BICSI Cares Scholarship, named for the former BICSI president and longtime BICSI Cares volunteer, were David Picariello and Joseph Lentine. Picariello is majoring in electronics engineering technology at Humber College in Toronto, Ontario Canada. Lentine is majoring in computer information systems at the University of Akron in Akron, OH.
Husband and wife David and Myra Bowling were honored as recipients of the Larry G. Romig Committee Member of the Year award. It was the first time in 12 years that the award went to two individuals rather than one. The Bowlings have dedicated years of service to the BICSI Cares Committee.
Patricia A. Fisher holds the professional designations RCDD, DCDC, OSP and WD, and now also holds the title of the 2012 David K. Blythe/University of Kentucky Award for Outstanding Member of the Year. The award honors "the volunteer spirit of BICSI members, and spotlights one individual ... for outstanding efforts in promoting BICSI's educational programs and commitment to professional development within the industry," BICSI explains. Fisher has been a BICSI member since 1998 and is active on several committees. BICSI specifically noted that she has organized several BICSI Breakfast Club events over the years.
David M. Richards, RCDD, NTS, OSP, ITS Technician, was honored with the Presidential Eagle Award, which is presented to an individual exhibiting leadership, sacrifice, faith in BICSI and dedication over a period of time, the association notes. BICSI commented on Richards' "neverending commitment to spreading ITS education across the globe, as well as for his work on the BICSI Installation Committee, which includes helping to create and implement the BICSI Cabling Skills Challenge."
The Harry J. Pfister Award for Excellence in the Communications Industry, characterized by BICSI as a "lifetime achievement or major accomplishment" award given to an individual in the telecommunications industry, was given to Mark S. Harger. Harger is active on several BICSI committees and "is highly knowledgeable in the field of bonding and grounding," BICSI notes. "His expertise and leadership has been used to help form and publish numerous standards, as well as several BICSI manuals."
Thomas "Lee" Renfroe, RCDD, ITS Technician, Certified Trainer was crowned BICSI Installer of the Year for finishing atop the 16 competitors in the 2012 BICSI Cabling Skills Challenge.
Additionally, BICSI awarded scholarships to two college/university students who are sons of BICSI members. Recipients of the Ray Gendron/BICSI Cares Scholarship, named for the former BICSI president and longtime BICSI Cares volunteer, were David Picariello and Joseph Lentine. Picariello is majoring in electronics engineering technology at Humber College in Toronto, Ontario Canada. Lentine is majoring in computer information systems at the University of Akron in Akron, OH.
Husband and wife David and Myra Bowling were honored as recipients of the Larry G. Romig Committee Member of the Year award. It was the first time in 12 years that the award went to two individuals rather than one. The Bowlings have dedicated years of service to the BICSI Cares Committee.
Patricia A. Fisher holds the professional designations RCDD, DCDC, OSP and WD, and now also holds the title of the 2012 David K. Blythe/University of Kentucky Award for Outstanding Member of the Year. The award honors "the volunteer spirit of BICSI members, and spotlights one individual ... for outstanding efforts in promoting BICSI's educational programs and commitment to professional development within the industry," BICSI explains. Fisher has been a BICSI member since 1998 and is active on several committees. BICSI specifically noted that she has organized several BICSI Breakfast Club events over the years.
David M. Richards, RCDD, NTS, OSP, ITS Technician, was honored with the Presidential Eagle Award, which is presented to an individual exhibiting leadership, sacrifice, faith in BICSI and dedication over a period of time, the association notes. BICSI commented on Richards' "neverending commitment to spreading ITS education across the globe, as well as for his work on the BICSI Installation Committee, which includes helping to create and implement the BICSI Cabling Skills Challenge."
The Harry J. Pfister Award for Excellence in the Communications Industry, characterized by BICSI as a "lifetime achievement or major accomplishment" award given to an individual in the telecommunications industry, was given to Mark S. Harger. Harger is active on several BICSI committees and "is highly knowledgeable in the field of bonding and grounding," BICSI notes. "His expertise and leadership has been used to help form and publish numerous standards, as well as several BICSI manuals."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
